How to read a tag. Only
verified counts toward a score — it means a typed connector
resolved this against a primary US federal record.
unconfirmed means the Verifier checked and could not confirm,
which very often means the source could not be queried at all rather than that
the claim is doubtful. refuted means a primary source
contradicts it. unverified means nothing has checked it yet.
21 CFR (Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations) 876.5030 classifies a "continent ileostomy catheter" — described as a flexible tubular device used as a form during surgery for continent ileostomy, providing drainage after surgery, that may also be inserted periodically by the patient for routine care to empty the ileal pouch — as Class I, exempt from premarket notification (510(k) (premarket notification)) procedures under subpart E of 21 CFR part 807, subject to the limitations in 21 CFR 876.9.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: python3 -m connectors regulation 876.5030 --title 21 --expect "may also be inserted periodically by the patient" confirms the section exists and is Class I, general controls, exempt from 510(k) under subpart E of part 807 subject to 876.9 — matching this claim's…the full check substance — but the exact phrase was a miss (connector status: unconfirmed, not refuted): actual text reads "the device may be inserted periodically by the patient for routine care to empty the ileal pouch" (no "also"), a close paraphrase, not a verbatim quote. Whether its scope extends to a standard (non-surgical, non-Kock-pouch) ileostomy is still open — the regulation text itself does not settle that, only FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) substantial-equivalence review would. — source: eCFR versioner title-21, issue 2026-08-27, section=876.5030
21 CFR 876.5900 classifies "ostomy pouch and accessories" — a bag attached to the patient's skin by an adhesive material, intended as a receptacle for collection of fecal material or urine following an ileostomy, colostomy, or ureterostomy — as Class I, exempt from premarket notification procedures, with associated product codes EXB, EZQ, and EZS.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: verified — note: python3 -m connectors regulation 876.5900 --title 21 --expect "receptacle for collection of fecal material" matched the section text verbatim (Class I, general controls, exempt from subpart E premarket notification subject to 876.9). All three product codes…the full check independently confirmed via classification --product-code: EXB = Collector, Ostomy; EZQ = Pouch, Colostomy; EZS = Appliance, Colostomy, Disposable — all Class I, all under 876.5900. Still carried only as a possible route for the external cap/reservoir component, not the valve-insert; the regulation text itself does not resolve fit for a device with an indwelling valve element, which is an FDA substantial-equivalence judgment, not something this connector settles. — source: eCFR versioner title-21, issue 2026-08-27, section=876.5900; openFDA device/classification product_code=EXB, EZQ, EZS
A competitor, Ampa Medical (Copenhagen, Denmark), is developing "InterPoc," an investigational absorbent device ("intestinal tampon") intended to be advanced past the stoma into the small bowel, that expands as it absorbs liquid stool and is removed by pulling an attached elastic string; a pilot safety/tolerability study with Aarhus University Hospital reported the device was safe and well tolerated in adults with an ileostomy over a 24-hour follow-up period, with results appearing in a British Journal of Nursing article.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no connector reaches a company product page or a non-PMID (PubMed identifier)-cited journal article, so the device description and pilot-study outcome remain unconfirmed on that portion. The regulatory-absence portion IS independently checked and consistent: `python3 -m connectors 510k…the full check "InterPoc" --applicant "Ampa Medical" → refuted (no 510(k) record found — read here as confirming absence, not contradicting the claim, since the claim itself asserts no US clearance was found); python3 -m connectors denovo "InterPoc" → unconfirmed, no local De Novo cache (data/fda_denovo.csv absent) — a tooling gap, not evidence no De Novo grant exists. Re-check 2026-09-29 (Verifier, De Novo cache now present, 494 records retrieved 2026-09-24): the De Novo lookup now returns refuted (no match), but that does NOT refute this claim — the claim asserts InterPoc is *investigational/in development*, not that any De Novo grant exists, so a no-grant result is consistent with it. The miss also could be a brand-vs-device-name artifact (the listing is keyed by device name), so the generic term was tried too (denovo "intestinal tampon" → refuted, no match), and a grep of the cache for Ampa/ostomy/stoma/ileostomy found no row. Tag held at unconfirmed: the device description and pilot-study outcome — the substance of the claim — still have no connector. — source: openFDA device/510k (no record); earlier record: De Novo unresolved for lack of cached listing; denovo "InterPoc" --jurisdiction US` → refuted (2026-09-29, "No granted De Novo (De Novo classification request) request matching 'InterPoc' in the cached FDA De Novo listing (494 records)" — local cache of FDA De Novo listing, device_name='InterPoc'; consistent with, not contrary to, the claim)
A competitor, Coloplast, markets "Heylo," a leakage-notification system consisting of a sensor layer applied to the ostomy baseplate, a Bluetooth transmitter, and a companion smartphone app that alerts the user at early signs of leakage; the product first launched in the UK and gained NHS (National Health Service) national reimbursement effective 1 July 2024.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: refuted — note: this claim's explicit disclaimer ("No US FDA clearance ... was found by the Generator and none is asserted here") is now factually wrong. python3 -m connectors 510k "Heylo" --applicant "Coloplast" → verified: Heylo(TM) System / Coloplast Corp. was cleared 2025-10-06,…the full check K252140 (an FDA 510(k) clearance number) — predating this candidate's 2026-08-30 generation date, so this was findable. clearance-summary K252140 confirms the Indications for Use: "Heylo(TM) System is indicated to allow detection of ostomy appliance leakage for people with an ileostomy or colostomy... individuals with an ostomy 12 years and older." This is material to Factor "Competitive intensity": the adjacent leak-sensor competitor this candidate deliberately positions against (see Indication-scope note, point 2) now has an active US market entry, not merely a UK one. The UK/NHS reimbursement date and the device mechanism description are separately unconfirmed — no UK/EU connector exists here (this repo is US-only) and the jurisdiction tag on this claim (US) does not match the UK content it's citing; that mismatch should be corrected by the Generator/Scorer, not silently fixed here, since claim text cannot be edited, only its tag. — source: openFDA device/510k k_number=K252140; FDA 510(k) summary K252140
Between approximately 725,000 and 1,000,000 Americans are living with an ostomy (any type — colostomy, ileostomy, or urostomy), and approximately 100,000 new ostomy surgeries are performed annually in the United States.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no connector reaches an aggregate population-prevalence figure of this kind (the procedures connector returns Medicare FFS (fee-for-service)coded-procedure volume, not total ostomy population, and would need a specific HCPCS (Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System)/CPT code to run against — none is cited here). Stays…the full check unconfirmed absent a primary epidemiological dataset (e.g. CDC/NHANES or a CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) claims-based prevalence study broken out by ostomy type) — source: none found beyond the UOAA public-materials citation already in the claim, which is not a primary dataset.
Reported leakage incidence among people living with an ostomy ranges from 18% to 76% across published studies, with roughly 37% of those experiencing leakage reporting it at least once per week; separately, over 81% of those who experienced leakage also reported peristomal skin irritation.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no connector reaches a pooled clinical-literature incidence range of this kind; PubMed records can be pulled by PMID via literature-detail, but this claim cites no PMID, only an unspecified set of "PMC-indexed review articles," so there is nothing concrete to run.…the full check Stays unconfirmed pending the Generator/Scorer naming specific PMIDs for the underlying studies — source: none, claim cites no resolvable primary identifier.
HCPCS codes A4361 (a HCPCS code for a supply) through A4438 constitute an established billing category ("Ostomy Pouches and Supplies") covering existing external pouching-system components (e.g. A4416, ostomy pouch, closed, with barrier attached, with filter, 1-piece; A4362, ostomy skin barrier, solid 4x4 or equivalent), administered under Medicare DMEPOS (durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies) with a published fee schedule.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: blocked on tooling, not on a finding. python3 -m connectors hcpcs A4416/A4362/A4361/A4438 all returned unconfirmed: no local cache at data/hcpcs_level_ii.csv. Same result for payment A4416 (no data/hcpcs_payment_rates.csv) and coverage A4416 (no…the full checkdata/medicare_coverage_policies.csv). None of these three missing files are evidence the codes don't exist or don't pay — per data/README.md an agent can fetch them via engine/scripts/fetch_data_file.py, which this Verifier pass did not do. This claim establishes only that a billing category exists for the conventional pouching system this device would displace; no HCPCS code for a valve-based collection-interface device of this shape was found or is asserted to exist, and that absence is separately unconfirmed for the same tooling reason. Second Verifier pass 2026-09-29 (HCPCS Level II, DMEPOS fee schedule and coverage caches now present): tag held at unconfirmed — not raised to verified, because the primary source contradicts one element of the claim's own wording, and not lowered to refuted, because that element is a range endpoint rather than the claim's substance. What verifies: A4416 is "Ostomy pouch, closed, with barrier attached, with filter (1 piece), each" (matches the claim); A4362 is "Skin barrier; solid, 4 x 4 or equivalent; each" (the claim's "ostomy skin barrier" wording is a paraphrase); A4361 is "Ostomy faceplate, each"; A4416 is priced on the July 2026 DMEPOS fee schedule, category OS (ostomy, tracheostomy & urological items), non-rural $3.93 across 49 contiguous states/DC (Medicare allowed amount, not payment). What does not: the stated upper bound A4438 is not an ostomy code — "Adhesive clip applied to the skin to secure external electrical nerve stimulator controller, each" — so "A4361 through A4438 constitute ... Ostomy Pouches and Supplies" is wrong as written. The ostomy codes in the cache run A4361-A4437 (A4402 "Lubricant, per ounce" is generic) and continue in A5051-A5131, which the claim's range leaves out. "Ostomy Pouches and Supplies" as a category name appears in no source reached. Recommend the Generator append a restated claim (A4361-A4437 plus A5051-A5131) rather than lean on this one. Separately, coverage A4416 returned no NCD (national coverage determination)/LCD naming the code; this claim asserts no coverage policy, so that result neither supports nor contradicts it, and a blank code linkage in the cached index is not proof that no ostomy LCD (local coverage determination) exists. — source: earlier record: none — cache files absent; 2026-09-29: hcpcs A4416 --expect "Ostomy pouch, closed, with barrier attached, with filter" --jurisdiction US → verified (CMS HCPCS Level II file, code=A4416); hcpcs A4362 --jurisdiction US → verified (code=A4362); hcpcs A4361 --jurisdiction US → verified (code=A4361); hcpcs A4438 --expect "Ostomy" --jurisdiction US → refuted (code=A4438, "Adhesive clip ... electrical nerve stimulator controller"); payment A4416 --jurisdiction US → verified (CMS DMEPOS fee schedule, code=A4416, release=July 2026, $3.93); coverage A4416 --jurisdiction US → refuted (cached Medicare Coverage Database: no policy names A4416; not asserted by this claim)
The U.S. ostomy care and accessories market generated approximately $586.6 million in revenue in 2025 (one market-research estimate; other published estimates for differently scoped "ostomy/stoma care" categories, some global, range from roughly $3.5B to $4.3B).
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: python3 -m connectors market "US ostomy care and accessories market $586.6 million 2025" → unverifiable (market-size claims have no free, authoritative, machine-queryable source; permanently unconfirmed absent a human-attached licensed report). This claim…the full check decomposes into a checkable piece the Generator did not separate out: procedure/code volume for A4361-A4438 is answerable via python3 -m connectors procedures <code> (Medicare FFS utilization), but was blocked this pass by the same missing data/hcpcs_level_ii.csv/rate-cache gap noted in claim 7unconfirmed above — no code volume was actually run. Recommend the Generator/Scorer restate this as a volume-times-price-times-share breakdown per phase2-spec's TAM (total addressable market) decomposition guidance rather than one blanket aggregator figure. Second Verifier pass 2026-09-29 (DMEPOS utilization and fee caches now present): tag held at unconfirmed — the claim is a revenue figure and market is unverifiable by design. One volume input now resolves, recorded here as decomposition input, not as support for $586.6M: A4416 had 1,014,232 Medicare FFS supplier-billed purchase services across 2,587 beneficiaries nationally (year not stated in the file; see data/provenance.json), at a non-rural July 2026 fee of $3.93. The services-to-beneficiaries ratio (about 392 per beneficiary) is high enough that the unit definition should be checked before anyone multiplies it. This is a Medicare FFS floor that excludes Medicare Advantage (Medicare Advantage), commercial, Medicaid, VA and cash-pay, for one code out of roughly 90 ostomy codes; it is not a market size. — source: none — aggregator estimate, not primary data; market connector confirms this class of claim cannot resolve past unconfirmed; 2026-09-29: procedures A4416 --jurisdiction US → verified (CMS Medicare DMEPOS utilization file, code=A4416, national); payment A4416 --jurisdiction US → verified (CMS DMEPOS fee schedule, code=A4416, release=July 2026)
US Patent 11,395,757 B2, "Continent ostomy valve and method of use," is a live, recently-issued US patent covering a continent-ostomy valve device and method — a potential freedom-to-operate concern for any device using a mechanical valve at a stoma, including this candidate's mechanism, and its claims scope was not read by the Generator.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: python3 -m connectors patent 11395757 and patent US11395757B2 both returned unconfirmed — PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY is not set in this environment, so no claims-scope reading, assignee identification, or expiration-date check was possible. This is a tooling gap, not…the full check a finding that the patent is clear — per policy, do not fall back to a generic patent-search query to route around the missing key. Still an open, potentially load-bearing FTO (freedom to operate) risk until a key is provisioned and this claim is re-run. Re-check 2026-09-29 (Verifier, patent connector now on EPO (European Patent Office) OPS and resolving kind codes): the bibliographic half now resolves — the patent exists as US11395757B2, titled "Continent Ostomy Valve and Method of Use," filed 2019-08-30, naive 20-year expiration 2039-08-30. Tag held at unconfirmed, not raised to verified, because the claim's own wording asserts more than dates: (a) "live" — the connector's expiry is a naive estimate that explicitly does not model maintenance-fee lapses, terminal disclaimers or PTA, so in-force status is not established; (b) "recently-issued" — no grant date was returned; (c) "a potential freedom-to-operate concern for ... this candidate's mechanism" — a patent lookup is dates only and never an FTO finding; the claims have still not been read, and any FTO reading is Tier 3 legal work. The FTO risk remains open and possibly load-bearing. — source: earlier record: none — PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY unset; patent US11395757B2 --jurisdiction US → verified (2026-09-29, EPO OPS published-data/publication docdb=US.11395757.B2: "Continent Ostomy Valve and Method of Use: filed 2019-08-30, naive 20yr term expiration 2039-08-30 (not yet expired)" — dates only, supports existence/title, not the live-status or FTO parts of the claim)
Multiple US patents and patent applications exist covering ostomy-pouch leak-detection sensing (e.g. "Ostomy monitoring system and method," "Ostomy leakage detection system," "Resistance sensor for identifying leak locations in ostomy system," and others located via web search), a body of art that bears on the sensor/notification competitive space (Heylo and similar) but not, as far as the Generator's search determined, on a non-absorptive mechanical valve device of this candidate's specific shape.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no specific patent number is cited in this claim, so there is nothing for the patent connector to look up even with a key present; PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY is also unset in this environment (same gap as claim 9unconfirmed), so this would be blocked either way. Recorded to show…the full check the Generator searched adjacent art and found it clusters around sensing, not valve mechanics, which is the basis (not yet verified) for treating claim 9unconfirmed (US 11,395,757 B2) rather than this body of art as the primary FTO risk — but that basis itself rests on an unread patent corpus and cannot be upgraded past unconfirmed without named patent numbers and a working connector call. — source: none — no resolvable patent identifiers cited, PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY unset
A device described as an "indwelling ileostomy valve device," using a Silastic tube with a circumferential balloon to provide a leakproof seal functionally replacing a failed nipple valve, was clinically studied in 14 patients and reported to maintain continuous, voluntary control over evacuation without adverse effects, published in 1980.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: python3 -m connectors literature-detail 7457715 returned the structured abstract and confirms this claim's description accurately: title "Indwelling ileostomy valve device," American Journal of Surgery, PubMed-indexed date 1981 (this claim says "published in 1980" —…the full check off by one year against the record), describing a Silastic tube with circumferential balloon replacing a failed continent-ileostomy nipple valve in 14 patients, "continuous and voluntary control ... without untoward local or systemic effects." Per phase2-spec, literature-detail returns a ScanResult with no confidence tag and structurally cannot resolve a claim to verified — it is a deeper read of the abstract, not appraised evidence (no methods, no risk-of-bias, no funding disclosure). Also note: the population in this abstract is explicitly post-continent- ileostomy-surgery patients with a failed nipple valve, not a standard ileostomy — consistent with how this candidate already frames it as mechanism precedent, not a regulatory predicate. — source: PubMed PMID=7457715 (efetch)
No FDA-cleared or De Novo-granted device matching the description "indwelling ileostomy valve," "stoma valve prosthesis," or similar, intended for use with a standard (non-continent, non-surgically-reconstructed) ileostomy, was identified by the Generator's web search.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: refuted — note: this claim is contradicted by a real FDA clearance.python3 -m connectors 510k "ileostomy valve" → verified: "WATERS ILEOSTOMY VALVE" / Waters Instruments, Inc., cleared 1982-04-09, K813585 (confirmed independently against openFDA device/510k directly:…the full check product_code=KNT). classification --product-code KNT → Device Class 2, "Tubes, Gastrointestinal (And Accessories)," current regulation 876.5980 — a third classification route this candidate's device_class frontmatter did not carry at all (only 876.5030 and 876.5900 were considered). Two things this finding does not settle, left for a human/Generator judgment rather than decided here: (1) clearance-summary K813585 → unconfirmed, no 510(k) summary PDF exists for a 1982-era filing (FDA's electronic repository has no posted summaries that old), so the device's actual Indications for Use — specifically whether it was cleared for a standard, non-surgically-reconstructed ileostomy or only for continent-ileostomy/Kock-pouch use — is not readable from any source this Verifier can reach; (2) the device was cleared in April 1982, seven months before 21 CFR 876.5030 (the current continent-ileostomy-catheter classification) was established (48 FR 53023, Nov 23 1983), so whether product code KNT / 876.5980 is still the governing classification or a superseded one is itself an open question. Net effect: the narrower "no search result was found" reading of this claim is refuted outright (a result exists and was locatable via the required connector on the first specific search term tried); the broader "no adequate predicate exists for this device" framing carried in predicate_or_analog is not resolved either way by this finding and needs a human/regulatory read of what K813585 actually covers. This is the single most consequential finding in this file's Verifier pass — see summary. — source: openFDA device/510k k_number=K813585; openFDA device/classification product_code=KNT; eCFR title-21 section=876.5980
Mechanism/clinical-risk assumption (Generator's own reasoning, flagged as an assumption rather than a fact): a non-absorptive mechanical valve seated at the stoma orifice avoids the retained-intraluminal-foreign-body and bowel-obstruction risk profile that would attach to a device advanced into the proximal small bowel, but introduces its own failure modes — valve occlusion by particulate effluent, leakage past the valve seal, and skin/mucosal irritation at the retention collar — none of which have been characterized by any bench or animal study, because none has been performed; this device does not yet exist as a prototype.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no connector applies — this is the Generator's own mechanism reasoning about a device with no prototype, not an empirical assertion any primary source could confirm or refute. Stays unconfirmed by construction; this is exactly the Factor 6 gap a Stage 7 bench-evidence…the full check plan would need to close. — source: none — Generator's own reasoning, not sourced to any study.
No domain dossier currently exists in this repo for ostomy/stoma care (checked: knowledge-base/domains/ contains no file for this clinical area as of the date this candidate was generated).
jurisdiction: US — confidence: verified — note: independently re-checked by listing knowledge-base/domains/ directly (2026-08-30): contains README.md, _template.md, and eleven dossiers covering other clinical areas (canine/equine wounds, tinnitus neuromodulation, ctDNA (circulating tumour DNA) MRD (molecular residual disease), feline CKD (chronic kidney disease), hemorrhoids, lymphedema…the full check compression, neonatal phototherapy, pediatric OSA (obstructive sleep apnoea), potassium monitoring, stress urinary incontinence, veterinary diabetes) — none for ostomy/stoma care. This is a repo-state check the directory itself is the primary source for, not an external-database claim. — source: knowledge-base/domains/ directory listing, confirmed 2026-08-30.
Adults with a mature, uncomplicated (non-surgically-reconstructed) ileostomy would be willing to learn and perform daily self-insertion and self-removal of an intraluminal stoma valve, in exchange for reduced pouch bulk and reduced adhesive-related skin exposure.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: stakeholder-behaviour claim; adoption returns unverifiable by design and no primary research (interview, survey, preference study) is attached, so it stays unconfirmed permanently absent a human-attached study. Not answered from model judgment. — source:…the full check deck-surfaced assumption (desirability deck, 2026-08-30); adoption "Adults with a mature ileostomy would be willing to learn and perform daily self-insertion and self-removal of an intraluminal stoma valve" → unverifiable (2026-09-29)
WOC (wound/ostomy/continence) nurses and other prescribing clinicians would be willing to train and support ileostomy patients in self-insertion and self-removal of an intraluminal stoma valve, rather than treating it as an added training and liability burden relative to a conventional adhesive pouching system.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: stakeholder-behaviour claim; adoption returns unverifiable by design and no primary research (interview, survey, preference study) is attached, so it stays unconfirmed permanently absent a human-attached study. Not answered from model judgment. — source:…the full check deck-surfaced assumption (desirability deck, 2026-08-30); adoption "WOC nurses and prescribing clinicians would be willing to train and support ileostomy patients in self-insertion and self-removal of an intraluminal stoma valve" → unverifiable (2026-09-29)
Ileostomy patients who currently experience pouch leakage and peristomal skin irritation would find a valve-and-cap collection interface preferable to their current adhesive pouching system beyond an initial trial period, sufficient to sustain continued daily use rather than reversion to pouching.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: stakeholder-behaviour claim; adoption returns unverifiable by design and no primary research (interview, survey, preference study) is attached, so it stays unconfirmed permanently absent a human-attached study. Not answered from model judgment. — source:…the full check deck-surfaced assumption (desirability deck, 2026-08-30); adoption "Ileostomy patients with leakage would find a valve-and-cap collection interface preferable to adhesive pouching beyond an initial trial period" → unverifiable (2026-09-29)
No HCPCS code, distinct from the existing A4361-A4438 adhesive-pouch billing category, currently exists that would allow Medicare DMEPOS billing for a valve-based, non-adhesive intraluminal stoma-collection device of this shape.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: second Verifier pass 2026-09-29, HCPCS Level II file now cached, so the descriptors were read. Tag held at unconfirmed, with the lead from the first pass now narrowed, not closed. The ostomy-category codes outside A4361-A4438 are: A5081 "Stoma plug or seal, any type"…the full check (non-rural $4.01-$4.72; 43,803 services / 557 beneficiaries); A5055 "Stoma cap" (non-rural $1.74-$2.05); A5082 "Continent device; catheter for continent stoma" and A5083 "Continent device, stoma absorptive cover for continent stoma"; plus pouch codes A5051-A5073 and accessories A5093-A5131. A5082 and A5083 are restricted by their own wording to a continent stoma, which this candidate's intended use expressly excludes (mature, non-surgically-reconstructed ileostomy), so they do not fit. A5081 "any type" and A5055 are the live question. A plug or seal occludes the stoma and a cap covers it, while this device passes effluent through a one-way valve into a drainable reservoir. The descriptors neither clearly include nor clearly exclude that, and only a PDAC (Pricing, Data Analysis and Coding contractor) coding verification decides which code a product falls under, so the claim can be neither verified nor refuted from descriptors. Two corrections to the claim's own premise: the range it names is not an "adhesive-pouch category" (its upper bound A4438 is a nerve-stimulator clip, see claim 7unconfirmed), and the category it names includes A4421 "Ostomy supply; miscellaneous", the usual fallback code for an ostomy item that no specific code describes. Viability read, not a tag: every candidate code for a stoma plug, seal or cap is priced at about $2-$5 allowed per unit. Earlier record (first pass, same date, before the HCPCS cache existed): hcpcs A5081/hcpcs A5082 → unconfirmed (no data/hcpcs_level_ii.csv). — source: deck-surfaced assumption (viability deck, 2026-08-30); hcpcs A5081 --expect "Stoma plug or seal" --jurisdiction US → verified (CMS HCPCS Level II file, code=A5081, "Stoma plug or seal, any type"); hcpcs A5082 --jurisdiction US → verified (code=A5082, "Continent device; catheter for continent stoma"); hcpcs A5083 --jurisdiction US → verified (code=A5083); hcpcs A5055 --jurisdiction US → verified (code=A5055, "Stoma cap"); payment A5081 --jurisdiction US → verified (CMS DMEPOS fee schedule, code=A5081, release=July 2026); payment A5082 --jurisdiction US → verified (code=A5082, release=July 2026); payment A5055 --jurisdiction US → verified (code=A5055, release=July 2026); procedures A5081 --jurisdiction US → verified (CMS Medicare DMEPOS utilization file, national); procedures A5082 --jurisdiction US → verified (CMS Medicare DMEPOS utilization file, national); coverage A5081 --jurisdiction US → refuted (no NCD/LCD in the cached index names A5081; not a denial) — 2026-09-29
Ileostomy patients or their DME (durable medical equipment)/insurance payer would pay a price for this device sufficient to sustain a dedicated specialty manufacturing and distribution channel, above the commodity per-unit reimbursement rates that apply to conventional adhesive ostomy pouching supplies.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: willingness-to-pay / payer-behaviour claim; adoption returns unverifiable by design and no primary research is attached. The checkable proxy (what Medicare allows for comparator ostomy codes) is a separate fact, not this claim — see claim 18unconfirmed's note for the…the full check A5081/A5082 fee lines. — source: deck-surfaced assumption (viability deck, 2026-08-30); adoption "Ileostomy patients or their DME payer would pay a price for this device above commodity ostomy-supply reimbursement rates" → unverifiable (2026-09-29)
This device's silicone one-way valve and low-profile external cap could be manufactured, sterilized (or validated for safe patient reprocessing/reuse), and given a shelf life suitable for a patient-replaceable, daily-use home medical device, at a unit cost compatible with DMEPOS-scale ostomy-supply reimbursement rates.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no connector applies — manufacturability, sterilization/reprocessing validation, shelf life and unit cost of a device with no prototype are engineering questions no primary database answers; closes only with bench/DFM work. No lookup run. — source: deck-surfaced…the full check assumption (feasibility deck, 2026-08-30); none — no connector for manufacturing feasibility (2026-09-29)
An adult patient with a mature ileostomy could be trained to correctly size, self-insert, and self-remove this intraluminal valve device without clinician supervision after an initial training period, and without causing mucosal trauma, stomal stenosis, or valve misplacement.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: patient-capability and clinical-safety claim for a device with no prototype and no usability or clinical study; adoption returns unverifiable by design and no primary research (interview, survey, preference study) is attached, so it stays unconfirmed permanently…the full check absent a human-attached study. Not answered from model judgment. — source: deck-surfaced assumption (feasibility deck, 2026-08-30); adoption "An adult with a mature ileostomy could be trained to size, self-insert and self-remove an intraluminal valve without clinician supervision and without mucosal trauma" → unverifiable (2026-09-29)
Adults with a mature, non-surgically-reconstructed ileostomy would accept emptying a low-profile external cap several times a day, including during the night, as a replacement for a continuously-filling adhesive pouch.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (desirability deck, 2026-09-29) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it — evidence class 3 (stakeholder future)
Ileostomy patients troubled by pouch leakage would choose to replace their adhesive pouching system with a valve-and-cap collection interface rather than add an FDA-cleared leak-detection accessory (such as Coloplast's Heylo, K252140) to the pouching system they already use.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (desirability deck, 2026-09-29) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it — evidence class 3 (stakeholder future)
A Medicare coverage policy (an NCD or a DME MAC (durable medical equipment Medicare administrative contractor) LCD) governing ostomy supplies exists and would apply to a valve-and-cap stoma-collection device billed under an existing ostomy HCPCS code such as A5081, A5055 or A4421.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (viability deck, 2026-09-29) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it — evidence class 1 (registry fact)
The WATERS ILEOSTOMY VALVE (K813585, Waters Instruments, product code KNT) is not currently listed as a commercially distributed device in FDA's establishment registration and device listing database.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (viability deck, 2026-09-29) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it — evidence class 1 (registry fact)
A primary epidemiological or CMS claims-based source reports the number of US adults living with an ileostomy separately from those living with a colostomy or urostomy.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (viability deck, 2026-09-29) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it — evidence class 2 (published finding)
A US patent application on this candidate's specific valve-and-retention-collar design could obtain issued claims that are neither anticipated nor rendered obvious by US 11,395,757 B2 or by the 1981 indwelling ileostomy valve device (PMID 7457715).
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (viability deck, 2026-09-29) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it
This device, valve insert and external cap together, falls within an existing Class I, 510(k)-exempt classification (21 CFR 876.5030 or 21 CFR 876.5900) and could be lawfully marketed in the US without a premarket submission.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (feasibility deck, 2026-09-29) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it — evidence class 1 (registry fact)
A low-profile external retention collar, without an adhesive wafer, can hold a soft silicone one-way valve seated at the stoma orifice of a mature ileostomy through normal daily activity and peristalsis without dislodgement and without effluent leaking past the valve seal.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (feasibility deck, 2026-09-29) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it
Words on this page25 abbreviation(s) and code(s), with what each stands for — copied from _shared/plain-language.md
21 CFR
Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations — the US food-and-drug rulebook; a number after it is one regulation, often the one that classifies a device type
510(k)
premarket notification — the FDA route for a device shown to be as safe and effective as one already on the market; months, no clinical trial as a rule
A####
a HCPCS code for a supply — one billing code for a supply or an accessory; the letter A and four digits
CKD
chronic kidney disease — long-term loss of kidney function
CMS
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — the US agency that runs Medicare, and so decides what Medicare pays for
ctDNA
circulating tumour DNA — fragments of a tumour's DNA found in the blood
De Novo
De Novo classification request — the FDA route for a new, lower-risk device with no comparable product to point at; longer than a 510(k), usually needs clinical data
DME
durable medical equipment — equipment a patient uses at home, such as a pump or a stimulator, that Medicare pays for under its own rules
DME MAC
durable medical equipment Medicare administrative contractor — one of the four regional contractors that process Medicare's home-equipment claims and write its local coverage rules
DMEPOS
durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies — the Medicare benefit and fee schedule that home equipment is paid under
EPO
European Patent Office — the European patent office
FDA
US Food and Drug Administration — the US regulator that clears or approves a device before it can be sold
FFS
fee-for-service — the traditional form of Medicare that pays per item or service
FTO
freedom to operate — whether a product can be sold without infringing someone else's live patent
HCPCS
Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System — the US billing codes for equipment, supplies and some services; a code is how a payer recognises what to pay for
K######
an FDA 510(k) clearance number — the public record of one cleared device; the letter K and six digits
LCD
local coverage determination — a Medicare contractor's rule, valid in its region, saying when something is covered
Medicare Advantage
Medicare Advantage — Medicare delivered through a private insurer; must cover at least what Medicare covers
MRD
molecular residual disease — cancer left behind after treatment, too little to see on a scan, detected through DNA in the blood
NCD
national coverage determination — a Medicare rule, valid everywhere in the US, saying whether and when something is covered
NHS
National Health Service — the UK's public health service
OSA
obstructive sleep apnoea — breathing that repeatedly stops during sleep because the airway closes
PDAC
Pricing, Data Analysis and Coding contractor — the Medicare contractor that decides which billing code a specific product falls under
PMID
PubMed identifier — the public id of one published medical paper
TAM
total addressable market — how much money the whole market would be worth if every possible buyer bought