Non-surgical, patient-self-inserted stoma-orifice outflow valve with low-profile; drainable cap, as an alternative collection interface to continuous-wear adhesive; ostomy pouches for mature ileostomies
7/9
factors scored
4/4
core factors
2/21
claims verified
2
refuted
How to read a tag. Only
verified counts toward a score — it means a typed connector
resolved this against a primary US federal record.
unconfirmed means the Verifier checked and could not confirm,
which very often means the source could not be queried at all rather than that
the claim is doubtful. refuted means a primary source
contradicts it. unverified means nothing has checked it yet.
claim 1unconfirmedUS
21 CFR 876.5030 classifies a "continent ileostomy catheter" — described as a flexible tubular device used as a form during surgery for continent ileostomy, providing drainage after surgery, that may also be inserted periodically by the patient for routine care to empty the ileal pouch — as Class I, exempt from premarket notification (510(k)) procedures under subpart E of 21 CFR part 807, subject to the limitations in 21 CFR 876.9.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: python3 -m connectors regulation 876.5030 --title 21 --expect "may also be inserted periodically by the patient" confirms the section exists and is Class I, general controls, exempt from 510(k) under subpart E of part 807 subject to 876.9 — matching this claim's…the full check substance — but the exact phrase was a miss (connector status: unconfirmed, not refuted): actual text reads "the device may be inserted periodically by the patient for routine care to empty the ileal pouch" (no "also"), a close paraphrase, not a verbatim quote. Whether its scope extends to a standard (non-surgical, non-Kock-pouch) ileostomy is still open — the regulation text itself does not settle that, only FDA substantial-equivalence review would. — source: eCFR versioner title-21, issue 2026-08-27, section=876.5030
claim 2verifiedUS
21 CFR 876.5900 classifies "ostomy pouch and accessories" — a bag attached to the patient's skin by an adhesive material, intended as a receptacle for collection of fecal material or urine following an ileostomy, colostomy, or ureterostomy — as Class I, exempt from premarket notification procedures, with associated product codes EXB, EZQ, and EZS.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: verified — note: python3 -m connectors regulation 876.5900 --title 21 --expect "receptacle for collection of fecal material" matched the section text verbatim (Class I, general controls, exempt from subpart E premarket notification subject to 876.9). All three product codes…the full check independently confirmed via classification --product-code: EXB = Collector, Ostomy; EZQ = Pouch, Colostomy; EZS = Appliance, Colostomy, Disposable — all Class I, all under 876.5900. Still carried only as a possible route for the external cap/reservoir component, not the valve-insert; the regulation text itself does not resolve fit for a device with an indwelling valve element, which is an FDA substantial-equivalence judgment, not something this connector settles. — source: eCFR versioner title-21, issue 2026-08-27, section=876.5900; openFDA device/classification product_code=EXB, EZQ, EZS
claim 3unconfirmedUS
A competitor, Ampa Medical (Copenhagen, Denmark), is developing "InterPoc," an investigational absorbent device ("intestinal tampon") intended to be advanced past the stoma into the small bowel, that expands as it absorbs liquid stool and is removed by pulling an attached elastic string; a pilot safety/tolerability study with Aarhus University Hospital reported the device was safe and well tolerated in adults with an ileostomy over a 24-hour follow-up period, with results appearing in a British Journal of Nursing article.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no connector reaches a company product page or a non-PMID-cited journal article, so the device description and pilot-study outcome remain unconfirmed on that portion. The regulatory-absence portion IS independently checked and consistent: `python3 -m connectors 510k…the full check "InterPoc" --applicant "Ampa Medical" → refuted (no 510(k) record found — read here as confirming absence, not contradicting the claim, since the claim itself asserts no US clearance was found); python3 -m connectors denovo "InterPoc" → unconfirmed, no local De Novo cache (data/fda_denovo.csv` absent) — a tooling gap, not evidence no De Novo grant exists. — source: openFDA device/510k (no record); De Novo unresolved for lack of cached listing
claim 4refutedUS
A competitor, Coloplast, markets "Heylo," a leakage-notification system consisting of a sensor layer applied to the ostomy baseplate, a Bluetooth transmitter, and a companion smartphone app that alerts the user at early signs of leakage; the product first launched in the UK and gained NHS national reimbursement effective 1 July 2024.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: refuted — note: this claim's explicit disclaimer ("No US FDA clearance ... was found by the Generator and none is asserted here") is now factually wrong. python3 -m connectors 510k "Heylo" --applicant "Coloplast" → verified: Heylo(TM) System / Coloplast Corp. was cleared 2025-10-06,…the full check K252140 — predating this candidate's 2026-08-30 generation date, so this was findable. clearance-summary K252140 confirms the Indications for Use: "Heylo(TM) System is indicated to allow detection of ostomy appliance leakage for people with an ileostomy or colostomy... individuals with an ostomy 12 years and older." This is material to Factor "Competitive intensity": the adjacent leak-sensor competitor this candidate deliberately positions against (see Indication-scope note, point 2) now has an active US market entry, not merely a UK one. The UK/NHS reimbursement date and the device mechanism description are separately unconfirmed — no UK/EU connector exists here (this repo is US-only) and the jurisdiction tag on this claim (US) does not match the UK content it's citing; that mismatch should be corrected by the Generator/Scorer, not silently fixed here, since claim text cannot be edited, only its tag. — source: openFDA device/510k k_number=K252140; FDA 510(k) summary K252140
claim 5unconfirmedUS
Between approximately 725,000 and 1,000,000 Americans are living with an ostomy (any type — colostomy, ileostomy, or urostomy), and approximately 100,000 new ostomy surgeries are performed annually in the United States.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no connector reaches an aggregate population-prevalence figure of this kind (the procedures connector returns Medicare FFS coded-procedure volume, not total ostomy population, and would need a specific HCPCS/CPT code to run against — none is cited here). Stays…the full check unconfirmed absent a primary epidemiological dataset (e.g. CDC/NHANES or a CMS claims-based prevalence study broken out by ostomy type) — source: none found beyond the UOAA public-materials citation already in the claim, which is not a primary dataset.
claim 6unconfirmedUS
Reported leakage incidence among people living with an ostomy ranges from 18% to 76% across published studies, with roughly 37% of those experiencing leakage reporting it at least once per week; separately, over 81% of those who experienced leakage also reported peristomal skin irritation.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no connector reaches a pooled clinical-literature incidence range of this kind; PubMed records can be pulled by PMID via literature-detail, but this claim cites no PMID, only an unspecified set of "PMC-indexed review articles," so there is nothing concrete to run.…the full check Stays unconfirmed pending the Generator/Scorer naming specific PMIDs for the underlying studies — source: none, claim cites no resolvable primary identifier.
claim 7unconfirmedUS
HCPCS codes A4361 through A4438 constitute an established billing category ("Ostomy Pouches and Supplies") covering existing external pouching-system components (e.g. A4416, ostomy pouch, closed, with barrier attached, with filter, 1-piece; A4362, ostomy skin barrier, solid 4x4 or equivalent), administered under Medicare DMEPOS with a published fee schedule.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: blocked on tooling, not on a finding. python3 -m connectors hcpcs A4416/A4362/A4361/A4438 all returned unconfirmed: no local cache at data/hcpcs_level_ii.csv. Same result for payment A4416 (no data/hcpcs_payment_rates.csv) and coverage A4416 (no…the full checkdata/medicare_coverage_policies.csv). None of these three missing files are evidence the codes don't exist or don't pay — per data/README.md an agent can fetch them via engine/scripts/fetch_data_file.py, which this Verifier pass did not do. This claim establishes only that a billing category exists for the conventional pouching system this device would displace; no HCPCS code for a valve-based collection-interface device of this shape was found or is asserted to exist, and that absence is separately unconfirmed for the same tooling reason. — source: none — cache files absent
claim 8unconfirmedUS
The U.S. ostomy care and accessories market generated approximately $586.6 million in revenue in 2025 (one market-research estimate; other published estimates for differently scoped "ostomy/stoma care" categories, some global, range from roughly $3.5B to $4.3B).
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: python3 -m connectors market "US ostomy care and accessories market $586.6 million 2025" → unverifiable (market-size claims have no free, authoritative, machine-queryable source; permanently unconfirmed absent a human-attached licensed report). This claim…the full check decomposes into a checkable piece the Generator did not separate out: procedure/code volume for A4361-A4438 is answerable via python3 -m connectors procedures <code> (Medicare FFS utilization), but was blocked this pass by the same missing data/hcpcs_level_ii.csv/rate-cache gap noted in claim 7 above — no code volume was actually run. Recommend the Generator/Scorer restate this as a volume-times-price-times-share breakdown per phase2-spec's TAM decomposition guidance rather than one blanket aggregator figure. — source: none — aggregator estimate, not primary data; market connector confirms this class of claim cannot resolve past unconfirmed
claim 9unconfirmedUS
US Patent 11,395,757 B2, "Continent ostomy valve and method of use," is a live, recently-issued US patent covering a continent-ostomy valve device and method — a potential freedom-to-operate concern for any device using a mechanical valve at a stoma, including this candidate's mechanism, and its claims scope was not read by the Generator.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: python3 -m connectors patent 11395757 and patent US11395757B2 both returned unconfirmed — PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY is not set in this environment, so no claims-scope reading, assignee identification, or expiration-date check was possible. This is a tooling gap, not…the full check a finding that the patent is clear — per policy, do not fall back to a generic patent-search query to route around the missing key. Still an open, potentially load-bearing FTO risk until a key is provisioned and this claim is re-run. — source: none — PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY unset
claim 10unconfirmedUS
Multiple US patents and patent applications exist covering ostomy-pouch leak-detection sensing (e.g. "Ostomy monitoring system and method," "Ostomy leakage detection system," "Resistance sensor for identifying leak locations in ostomy system," and others located via web search), a body of art that bears on the sensor/notification competitive space (Heylo and similar) but not, as far as the Generator's search determined, on a non-absorptive mechanical valve device of this candidate's specific shape.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no specific patent number is cited in this claim, so there is nothing for the patent connector to look up even with a key present; PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY is also unset in this environment (same gap as claim 9), so this would be blocked either way. Recorded to show…the full check the Generator searched adjacent art and found it clusters around sensing, not valve mechanics, which is the basis (not yet verified) for treating claim 9 (US 11,395,757 B2) rather than this body of art as the primary FTO risk — but that basis itself rests on an unread patent corpus and cannot be upgraded past unconfirmed without named patent numbers and a working connector call. — source: none — no resolvable patent identifiers cited, PATENTSVIEW_API_KEY unset
claim 11unconfirmedUS
A device described as an "indwelling ileostomy valve device," using a Silastic tube with a circumferential balloon to provide a leakproof seal functionally replacing a failed nipple valve, was clinically studied in 14 patients and reported to maintain continuous, voluntary control over evacuation without adverse effects, published in 1980.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: python3 -m connectors literature-detail 7457715 returned the structured abstract and confirms this claim's description accurately: title "Indwelling ileostomy valve device," American Journal of Surgery, PubMed-indexed date 1981 (this claim says "published in 1980" —…the full check off by one year against the record), describing a Silastic tube with circumferential balloon replacing a failed continent-ileostomy nipple valve in 14 patients, "continuous and voluntary control ... without untoward local or systemic effects." Per phase2-spec, literature-detail returns a ScanResult with no confidence tag and structurally cannot resolve a claim to verified — it is a deeper read of the abstract, not appraised evidence (no methods, no risk-of-bias, no funding disclosure). Also note: the population in this abstract is explicitly post-continent- ileostomy-surgery patients with a failed nipple valve, not a standard ileostomy — consistent with how this candidate already frames it as mechanism precedent, not a regulatory predicate. — source: PubMed PMID=7457715 (efetch)
claim 12refutedUS
No FDA-cleared or De Novo-granted device matching the description "indwelling ileostomy valve," "stoma valve prosthesis," or similar, intended for use with a standard (non-continent, non-surgically-reconstructed) ileostomy, was identified by the Generator's web search.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: refuted — note: this claim is contradicted by a real FDA clearance.python3 -m connectors 510k "ileostomy valve" → verified: "WATERS ILEOSTOMY VALVE" / Waters Instruments, Inc., cleared 1982-04-09, K813585 (confirmed independently against openFDA device/510k directly:…the full check product_code=KNT). classification --product-code KNT → Device Class 2, "Tubes, Gastrointestinal (And Accessories)," current regulation 876.5980 — a third classification route this candidate's device_class frontmatter did not carry at all (only 876.5030 and 876.5900 were considered). Two things this finding does not settle, left for a human/Generator judgment rather than decided here: (1) clearance-summary K813585 → unconfirmed, no 510(k) summary PDF exists for a 1982-era filing (FDA's electronic repository has no posted summaries that old), so the device's actual Indications for Use — specifically whether it was cleared for a standard, non-surgically-reconstructed ileostomy or only for continent-ileostomy/Kock-pouch use — is not readable from any source this Verifier can reach; (2) the device was cleared in April 1982, seven months before 21 CFR 876.5030 (the current continent-ileostomy-catheter classification) was established (48 FR 53023, Nov 23 1983), so whether product code KNT / 876.5980 is still the governing classification or a superseded one is itself an open question. Net effect: the narrower "no search result was found" reading of this claim is refuted outright (a result exists and was locatable via the required connector on the first specific search term tried); the broader "no adequate predicate exists for this device" framing carried in predicate_or_analog is not resolved either way by this finding and needs a human/regulatory read of what K813585 actually covers. This is the single most consequential finding in this file's Verifier pass — see summary. — source: openFDA device/510k k_number=K813585; openFDA device/classification product_code=KNT; eCFR title-21 section=876.5980
claim 13unconfirmedUS
Mechanism/clinical-risk assumption (Generator's own reasoning, flagged as an assumption rather than a fact): a non-absorptive mechanical valve seated at the stoma orifice avoids the retained-intraluminal-foreign-body and bowel-obstruction risk profile that would attach to a device advanced into the proximal small bowel, but introduces its own failure modes — valve occlusion by particulate effluent, leakage past the valve seal, and skin/mucosal irritation at the retention collar — none of which have been characterized by any bench or animal study, because none has been performed; this device does not yet exist as a prototype.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unconfirmed — note: no connector applies — this is the Generator's own mechanism reasoning about a device with no prototype, not an empirical assertion any primary source could confirm or refute. Stays unconfirmed by construction; this is exactly the Factor 6 gap a Stage 7 bench-evidence…the full check plan would need to close. — source: none — Generator's own reasoning, not sourced to any study.
claim 14verifiedUS
No domain dossier currently exists in this repo for ostomy/stoma care (checked: knowledge-base/domains/ contains no file for this clinical area as of the date this candidate was generated).
jurisdiction: US — confidence: verified — note: independently re-checked by listing knowledge-base/domains/ directly (2026-08-30): contains README.md, _template.md, and eleven dossiers covering other clinical areas (canine/equine wounds, tinnitus neuromodulation, ctDNA MRD, feline CKD, hemorrhoids, lymphedema…the full check compression, neonatal phototherapy, pediatric OSA, potassium monitoring, stress urinary incontinence, veterinary diabetes) — none for ostomy/stoma care. This is a repo-state check the directory itself is the primary source for, not an external-database claim. — source: knowledge-base/domains/ directory listing, confirmed 2026-08-30.
claim 15unverifiedUS
Adults with a mature, uncomplicated (non-surgically-reconstructed) ileostomy would be willing to learn and perform daily self-insertion and self-removal of an intraluminal stoma valve, in exchange for reduced pouch bulk and reduced adhesive-related skin exposure.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (desirability deck, 2026-08-30) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it
claim 16unverifiedUS
WOC (wound/ostomy/continence) nurses and other prescribing clinicians would be willing to train and support ileostomy patients in self-insertion and self-removal of an intraluminal stoma valve, rather than treating it as an added training and liability burden relative to a conventional adhesive pouching system.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (desirability deck, 2026-08-30) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it
claim 17unverifiedUS
Ileostomy patients who currently experience pouch leakage and peristomal skin irritation would find a valve-and-cap collection interface preferable to their current adhesive pouching system beyond an initial trial period, sufficient to sustain continued daily use rather than reversion to pouching.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (desirability deck, 2026-08-30) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it
claim 18unverifiedUS
No HCPCS code, distinct from the existing A4361-A4438 adhesive-pouch billing category, currently exists that would allow Medicare DMEPOS billing for a valve-based, non-adhesive intraluminal stoma-collection device of this shape.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (viability deck, 2026-08-30) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it
claim 19unverifiedUS
Ileostomy patients or their DME/insurance payer would pay a price for this device sufficient to sustain a dedicated specialty manufacturing and distribution channel, above the commodity per-unit reimbursement rates that apply to conventional adhesive ostomy pouching supplies.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (viability deck, 2026-08-30) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it
claim 20unverifiedUS
This device's silicone one-way valve and low-profile external cap could be manufactured, sterilized (or validated for safe patient reprocessing/reuse), and given a shelf life suitable for a patient-replaceable, daily-use home medical device, at a unit cost compatible with DMEPOS-scale ostomy-supply reimbursement rates.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (feasibility deck, 2026-08-30) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it
claim 21unverifiedUS
An adult patient with a mature ileostomy could be trained to correctly size, self-insert, and self-remove this intraluminal valve device without clinician supervision after an initial training period, and without causing mucosal trauma, stomal stenosis, or valve misplacement.
jurisdiction: US — confidence: unverified — source: deck-surfaced assumption (feasibility deck, 2026-08-30) — never checked; recorded so the Verifier can see it