idea-001 · business case
Who pays, from which budget, how much, and 2-4 commercial routes to first revenue — every figure below traces to a copied claim or a declared assumption, and the routes are laid out unranked. Choosing a commercial strategy is a Tier 3 act, so this page presents options and stops.
Intended use: The device is indicated for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in cognitively intact adult women in the home setting, by prescription, following a documented failed four-week trial of pelvic muscle exercise training.
Rebuilt 2026-10-01 for pivot P2 the discriminating trigger, from the candidate file read cold. The P1 commercially-insured first build is retired, not patched. It had seen none of claims 167–214. P2 the discriminating trigger changed mechanism:. The device now has a two-channel trigger: pelvic floor surface EMG (electromyography) from the probe, plus an abdominal surface-EMG reference from a skin electrode the woman places herself each session. A burst fires on a voluntary pelvic floor contraction and is withheld when the detector sees a Valsalva manoeuvre or abdominal brace before the burst. intended_use:, the payer route and the E0740 (a HCPCS code for durable medical equipment) rental shape are unchanged. At Legal & IP (intellectual property)'s request, the withhold logic is described on this page no further than that field describes it.
Three facts set the shape of the money at P2 the discriminating trigger. Read them before anything else.
So at a fixed payer price, P2 the discriminating trigger raises the cost and its only upside is share. This page describes that bet. It does not weigh it.
The budget-holder chain, end to end. The manufacturer does not bill a payer. A DME (durable medical equipment) supplier does.
Six questions, each with its own evidence position and one basis. No score, no tier and no composite. Read the coverage line first.
| # | Question | Finding | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2a | Coding route — Cat I / Cat III / unlisted / HCPCS (Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System) II / none | The route is HCPCS Level II, and it is not established for the P2 the discriminating trigger configuration. E0740 exists for the device class. Whether the PDAC (Pricing, Data Analysis and Coding contractor) codes a probe plus a self-placed abdominal reference electrode as one E0740 system is open. The alternatives are splitting the reference out under E0746, which has no fee schedule amount, or assigning E1399 | claim 180unconfirmed |
| 2b | Payment adequacy — does the rate clear a stated cost floor | The rate is read. No cost floor exists to test it against. The monthly allowed amount is fixed whatever the device's features. Whether the landed cost per rental month clears it, now including that month's reference electrodes, is an assumption no file has priced | [assumption A1 The classification regulation for a…] |
| 2c | Practice-expense headroom — does the PE portion cover the device | No practice-expense portion exists on this route. The device is dispensed as a DMEPOS (durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies) item, so no PE RVU (relative value unit) carries its cost | claim 69verified |
| 2d | Site of care & bundling — office/facility differential, DRG or APC packaging | Home, supplier-billed, paid one rental month at a time, with no facility claim to package it into. Capped-rental category, RR line only, title after thirteen continuous months | claim 82verified |
| 2e | Coverage — has any payer agreed to pay for this indication | Medicare's national coverage determination covers the therapy class for cognitively intact patients after a documented failed four-week exercise trial. The intended_use: mirrors this | claim 9verified |
| 2f | Ex-US pathway — DE NUB/G-DRG, UK NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence)/OPCS-4 | Permanently unconfirmed, not under-researched. launch_jurisdiction: is US and no connector reaches a non-US payment system. The only non-US line in the file is a UK clinical guideline that recommends against routine use of the two features this device is built from. That is not a payment finding | claim 95unconfirmed |
Pillars on verified claims: 3/6 · on assumptions: 1 · queued as research: 0
The other two pillars rest on unconfirmed claims: 2a on a PDAC determination, and 2f on a clinical guideline that is not a payment source.
The three verified pillars describe the class and the payment mechanics. The two that decide whether this product is paid for at a margin are 2a and 2b: does it code to E0740, and does the monthly amount clear its cost. Neither rests on a verified claim. P2 the discriminating trigger widened both. 2a now has a second electrode for the PDAC to rule on, and 2b now has a per-session consumable.
What sits behind each row:
Three distinctions kept apart deliberately:
Verdicts recorded where a check was run this pass:
python3 -m connectors hcpcs E0740 → verified: "Non-implanted pelvic floor electrical stimulator, complete system", the descriptor claim 7verified records.
python3 -m connectors payment E0740 --modifier RR → verified, the July 2026 RR capped-rental line claim 193verified records. --state PR → verified at the Puerto Rico amount claim 71verified.
python3 -m connectors coverage E0740 --expect-stance covered → refuted: "No NCD or LCD in the cached coverage file names E0740 … NOT the same as a denial". The cached index does not link the NCD to the code. That is a gap in the cache, not in what the NCD covers claim 9verified.
python3 -m connectors ncd 230.8 --expect "failed a documented trial of pelvic muscle exercise" → verified, CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) Pub. 100-3 Rev. 13808 claim 9verified.
python3 -m connectors rvu E0740 → refuted: "No code E0740 in the cached CMS Physician Fee Schedule RVU file". That is what claim 69verified needs, not evidence against it.
python3 -m connectors rvu 90912 --device-cost 74.52 → refuted, a practice-expense shortfall. Read it as a unit mismatch on the home route: the stated cost is one month's rental fee, and the in-office service it tests is one this route does not bill into claim 66unconfirmed. It binds only on Route C, and there the device cost is unstated claim 120unconfirmed.
python3 -m connectors hcpcs E0746 → verified ("Electromyography (emg), biofeedback device"). payment E0746 → refuted: no row on the DMEPOS fee schedule. This is the coding branch in which the reference channel is split out and paid nothing claim 180unconfirmed.
python3 -m connectors hcpcs A4595 / payment A4595 → verified, a priced monthly supply code. Whether it is separately payable alongside an E0740 rental is a DME MAC (durable medical equipment Medicare administrative contractor) question claim 181unconfirmed.
python3 -m connectors drg and apc → unconfirmed, no local cache. That is a tooling gap, and it does not matter here because nothing on the home route is facility-billed claim 82verified.
python3 -m connectors cpt 98977 → unverifiable: "CPT descriptors are AMA-licensed and cannot be scraped or reproduced verbatim … The code NUMBER is not barred". No descriptor is reproduced on this page. The RTM (remote therapeutic monitoring) device-supply scope reaches no named pelvic indication either way claim 77verified.
There is no market model for this candidate. knowledge-base/market-models/idea-001.md does not exist, so this section does not build a size. It quotes the legs the file holds and names the ones it does not. Every leg above the Medicare fee-for-service floor rests on an unconfirmed claim, on an assumption, or on nothing at all.
| Line | Figure | Backing |
|---|---|---|
| Medicare FFS (fee-for-service) beneficiaries dispensed under E0740, data year 2024 (a floor, never a market size) | 689 | claim 70verified |
| Medicare FFS E0740 rental months billed, data year 2024 | 4,130 | claim 70verified |
| The Generator's original E0740 volume threshold (refuted) | more than 10,000 units a year | claim 17refuted |
| Medicare allowed amount per rental month, non-rural, July 2026, any device coded E0740 | $74.52 | claim 193verified |
| Realized average allowed amount per rental month, data year 2024 | $57.89 | claim 71verified |
| Realized allowed amount per beneficiary, data year 2024 (4,130 × $57.89 ÷ 689) | about $347 | claim 163unconfirmed |
| Continuous rental months at which title passes to the woman | 13 | claim 82verified |
| Payment premium the P2 the discriminating trigger reference channel earns under E0740 | none | claim 193verified |
| Medicare Advantage women added to the FFS floor | not measured | claim 171unconfirmed |
| Commercially insured women dispensed a device each year | not stated | claim 67unconfirmed |
| Share of E0740 dispensing won by a P2 the discriminating trigger device by year 3 | not stated | claim 46unconfirmed |
| Manufacturer price to the DME supplier | not stated; below the allowed amount | claim 122unconfirmed |
| Price that covers the per-session electrodes at the same allowable | not stated | claim 214unverified |
| Reference electrodes consumed per session | 2 to 3 | claim 208unconfirmed |
| Home sessions per course | not stated | claim 183unconfirmed |
| Separately payable supply line for the reference electrodes | none assumed (A4595 is priced at $11.40–$13.24 a month) | claim 181unconfirmed |
| Landed cost per rental month, including that month's reference electrodes | below $74.52 | [assumption A1 The classification regulation for a…] |
| Gross margin | not stated | claim 49unconfirmed |
| Remote-therapeutic-monitoring and biofeedback-service revenue counted | zero | claim 88unconfirmed |
| List price of the one triggered incumbent shown for US sale (MyOnyx bundle, a purchase, not a rental) | $3,645.00 | claim 194unconfirmed |
How to read the table:
Verdicts on the two connectors this section is mostly made of:
python3 -m connectors market "Commercially insured women with stress urinary incontinence dispensed a prescription home pelvic floor stimulator each year outnumber the 689 Medicare fee-for-service E0740 beneficiaries" → unverifiable: "has no free, authoritative, machine-queryable source. Stays unconfirmed permanently unless a human attaches a licensed report". The same proposition is on the claim list claim 67unconfirmed.
python3 -m connectors adoption "A prescribing urogynecologist chooses a home EMG-triggered stimulator whose trigger uses a self-placed abdominal reference electrode over a cleared single-channel EMG-triggered device" → unverifiable: "needs primary research (interviews, survey, published preference study) … Do NOT substitute a model's own estimate of stakeholder behaviour". That is claim 174unconfirmed, and only primary research settles it.
python3 -m connectors adoption "A DME supplier stocks a two-channel EMG-triggered home pelvic floor stimulator in its E0740 rental inventory" → unverifiable, the same verdict. That is claim 170unconfirmed.
Four routes, laid out side by side. This section does not rank them or choose between them. Choosing a commercial strategy is a human's decision. Two things bear on all four, so they are not used as any one route's kill:
All four assumptions cited above, with what would settle each and who could run it. They were written back to the candidate as claims 215–218 before this file was written. Each falsifier is written to run off a registry, a document or a revealed behaviour where it can. A falsifier that runs through a prescribing practice depends on that practice letting a manufacturer in, which is itself unestablished claim 126unconfirmed.
Older assumptions are not repeated. The retired builds' assumptions are claims 46–54, 66–69, 121–123 and 132–137, and this page cites them at their current tags.
| # | Assumption | Falsifier | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 The classification regulation for a… | The landed cost per rental month of a P2 the discriminating trigger-configuration home stimulator billed under E0740 is below the non-rural E0740 RR monthly allowed amount. The cost covers the controller amortised over its rental life, the single-patient-use probe, connectivity, and the reference electrodes used in that month's sessions. (Candidate claim 215unverified, no evidence class stamped) | The landed monthly cost computation REQ-0176 Under P2 asks Operations for. It is fed by a contract-manufacturer bill of materials, sessions per course (REQ-0177 For the P2 device as prescribed at home…), electrodes per session (claim 208unconfirmed) and a controller service life (claim 141unconfirmed), and set against the July 2026 DMEPOS E0740 RR line | Operations & NPI (new product introduction), with a human-attached contract-manufacturer quote |
| A2 A device with this intended use is eligible… | The verification and validation P2 the discriminating trigger adds to the 510(k) keeps time and capital to first revenue inside the low-single-digit-million, sub-two-year envelope candidate claim 30unconfirmed asserts. The added work is two-channel detector verification, usability validation of patient self-placement of the reference electrode, and isolation and leakage testing of the abdominal input. (Candidate claim 216unverified, no evidence class stamped) | A costed regulatory and V&V plan for the P2 the discriminating trigger configuration, plus FDA's pre-submission answer on whether reference placement is a critical task needing a human factors validation study (claim 192unconfirmed) and whether a De Novo (De Novo classification request) or clinical data is required (claim 188unconfirmed) | Regulatory, with Operations & NPI costing the test programme |
| A3 Medicare NCD 230.8 covers pelvic floor… | A pelvic floor PT (physical therapist) or urogynecology practice buying a clinic EMG-triggered intravaginal stimulation system pays more for one whose trigger withholds on an abdominal surface-EMG reference channel than the MyOnyx bundle's published list price. (Candidate claim 217unverified, class: stakeholder) | Revealed behaviour first: purchase records or group-purchasing contract prices showing whether practices pay a premium for two-channel over one-channel biofeedback-stimulation systems. Failing that, a structured pricing interview with twenty practice purchasing decision-makers | Commercial, run by a human. No agent may answer it |
| A4 TAM component 1 | Verity Medical or Thought Technology, which hold cleared two-EMG-channel ETS devices, would pay a licence fee for a trigger that withholds on an abdominal reference channel rather than build one or do without. (Candidate claim 218unverified, class: stakeholder) | Revealed behaviour first: USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) assignment and licence recordations, and each firm's 510(k) history, showing whether either has ever brought in outside stimulation-control technology. Then a direct licensing approach to both firms | Legal & IP for the records read; business development, a human, for the approach |
Every figure this case needs that no verified claim carries. These are the work items.
/market-model idea-001 (REQ-0046 Build the market model this candidate has…) is the only pass in the repo that would type the size legs and commission the missing ones. Under P2 the discriminating trigger, its units leg has to count five objects, not one.
unconfirmed comparative claim speaks to it. market returns unverifiable on it, permanently.
_shared/plain-language.md